Re: gEDA-user: Draft Licence for Open Source Hardware published (OT)

[timecop <timecop@xxxxxxxxx>]

You said you wanted a "100% open source tool chain" and gave FPGA as example.
So, please name a vendor who provides such hardware/software (for FPGA
design) which would satisfy this license requirement of being "100%
open".



On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Dave N6NZ <n6nz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>
> On Jul 14, 2010, at 9:47 PM, timecop wrote:
>
>>> Example: FPGA's.  Verilog source isn't going to help if the FPGA fitter tool proprietary
>>
>> OK.
>> Please name a vendor for FPGA hardware + toolchain that fits into this
>> absolutely ridiculous requirement.
>
> I don't understand your question.  Can you clarify?
>
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> geda-user mailing list
>> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user