Re: gEDA-user: Draft Licence for Open Source Hardware published (OT)

[Dave N6NZ <n6nz@xxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 14, 2010, at 10:50 PM, timecop wrote:

> You said you wanted a "100% open source tool chain" and gave FPGA as example.
> So, please name a vendor who provides such hardware/software (for FPGA
> design) which would satisfy this license requirement of being "100%
> open".

I don't believe there is one.  Yet, a license that says only that you must publish design data in publicly documented file format would allow such a design.  That is my point.

> 
> 
> 
> On Thu, Jul 15, 2010 at 2:06 PM, Dave N6NZ <n6nz@xxxxxxxx> wrote:
>> 
>> On Jul 14, 2010, at 9:47 PM, timecop wrote:
>> 
>>>> Example: FPGA's.  Verilog source isn't going to help if the FPGA fitter tool proprietary
>>> 
>>> OK.
>>> Please name a vendor for FPGA hardware + toolchain that fits into this
>>> absolutely ridiculous requirement.
>> 
>> I don't understand your question.  Can you clarify?
>> 
>>> 
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> geda-user mailing list
>>> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>>> 
>> 
>> 
>> 
>> _______________________________________________
>> geda-user mailing list
>> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
>> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
>> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user
> 



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user