Re: gEDA-user: PCB X.00

[Steven Michalske <smichalske@xxxxxxxxx>]

On Jul 17, 2010, at 8:53 AM, kai-martin knaak <kmk@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> DJ Delorie wrote on the other list, were mere mortals like me are not 
> allowed to post:
> 
>> I don't know.  My conundrum at the moment is that pcb is at 1.99z so
>> we're out of letters, 
> 
> why not go on with either 1.100, or 1.991, or 1.99za, or 1.99Ã ...
> 
> Seriously, I'd love to see some form of more fine grained versions. Why not 
> three dot separated numbers like almost every other application on my 
> desktop (gnome 2.28.3, KDE 4.3.4, ooffice 2.2.0? The pcb version has been so 
> long at 99.z that it renders the result of the --version command line option 
> virtually useless. 
> 
> This output should include some automatically at compile time generated bits 
> of information. Say, the build time, and when applicable, the patch level 
> and the name of the current git branch.
> 
The 7 digit sha sum is a good thing too when it comes to a detailed revision.

> ---<)kaimartin(>---
> -- 
> Kai-Martin Knaak
> Ãffentlicher PGP-SchlÃssel:
> http://pgp.mit.edu:11371/pks/lookup?op=get&search=0x6C0B9F53
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user