[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: pcb-20040530 snapshot
- To: geda-user@seul.org
- Subject: Re: gEDA-user: pcb-20040530 snapshot
- From: Dan McMahill <dan@mcmahill.net>
- Date: Tue, 1 Jun 2004 07:48:40 -0400
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Tue, 01 Jun 2004 07:49:44 -0400
- In-reply-to: <20040531171405.59b9edb0.david@kosmosisland.com>
- References: <20040531230114.GC350@bondage.mcmahill.net> <20040531171405.59b9edb0.david@kosmosisland.com>
- Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org
- User-agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
On Mon, May 31, 2004 at 05:14:05PM -0700, David Koski wrote:
> Thanks Dan!
>
> On Mon, 31 May 2004 19:01:14 -0400
> Dan McMahill <dan@mcmahill.net> wrote:
>
> > - Ordering is preserved when writing output files so that diff
> > may be effectively used on pcb files.
>
> Does that mean it will be reasonable to use cvs on pcb files?
>
I certainly do, but I don't think I've ever bothered with doing
cvs diffs on pcb files. For me its been more useful as a way to
manage some checkpoint backups along the way, tag a design
(schematics and layout) before a review and before ordering a board.
-Dan
--