[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Light vs heavy gschem symbols?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Hi!
Am 01.06.2005 um 13:57 schrieb Stuart Brorson:
Personally, I like gschem's attribute mechanism just the way it is.
"Light" footprints provide maximum flexibility to users who know what
they are doing.
You do not need to sacrify flexibility. I wo7uld suggest do attach
something like
MenuFootprint: DIL-14, SO-14
to a symbol, gschem can construct a selection menu fron this list. This
menu always can contain an other... entry, which lets the user enter
text. Something like the windows combobox could be used, too. You can
either select one entry of the list or just type in yor own one, if you
ant something else.
73, Mario
- --
Mario Klebsch mario@xxxxxxxxxx
PGP-Key available at http://www.klebsch.de/public.key
Fingerprint DSS: EE7C DBCC D9C8 5DC1 D4DB 1483 30CE 9FB2 A047 9CE0
Diffie-Hellman: D447 4ED6 8A10 2C65 C5E5 8B98 9464 53FF 9382 F518
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCncFOMM6fsqBHnOARAjHUAKDO86172oZPIcbCO/HYPhF3uVxTTwCg1+UI
H60D+ALwll+C53/LFGZsbbk=
=hdio
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----