[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
gEDA-user: LGPL symbols vs. GPL symbols?
- To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: gEDA-user: LGPL symbols vs. GPL symbols?
- From: "Samuel A. Falvo II" <sam.falvo@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sat, 4 Jun 2005 22:48:04 -0700
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Sun, 05 Jun 2005 01:45:41 -0400
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:reply-to:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=dJ8kTnIPGQ9C2IIJiRz+xvTrMaBlmDUVhx9rXx10+6UK5qYRxAZjz3GgSHiXG5ZLtWZmg7VK7WLqBL7aAXHQihYFEQQaqAaeFezvE98kbdhMWs09cUuJJrHWoVgWTdBm9Jn3TxAjpIImISFdrks14+LgINBqaOvGc5VmkMk4W58=
- Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
I'm curious to learn whether LGPL symbols would be accepted via the
symbol submission form on the gEDA website. I have constructed the
65816, 6522, and a really generic 7805 symbol, which I think would
make good incorporations into the symbol set. As my project is
currently creative commons, I will likely switch over to LGPL once I
finish reading and mulling over the LGPL verbiage.
Thanks.
--
Samuel A. Falvo II