[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: footprints
- To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Subject: Re: gEDA-user: footprints
- From: Karel Kulhavy <clock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Sun, 5 Mar 2006 19:16:28 +0100
- Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
- Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
- Delivery-date: Sun, 05 Mar 2006 13:48:12 -0500
- In-reply-to: <440243AA.2040604@ntlworld.com>
- References: <440243AA.2040604@ntlworld.com>
- Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
- User-agent: Mutt/1.5.11
On Mon, Feb 27, 2006 at 12:11:22AM +0000, Marc Price wrote:
> Ive tried multiple times now using Grep to find the footprint for a
> resistor i add it and it doesnt work! every time i try it either uses
> the wrong footprint or says error, surely a footprint selector of some
> sort needs to be added to either gattrib or gschem in order to simplify
> this process.
That's exactly what happened to me in the early days when I attempted to
use the m4. Simple grep is not enough. You have to basically reverse
engineer the sources in the m4 languages. Good luck.
And that's what I did then. I fortunately don't have to handle this
anymore because I already cracked those few footprints that are of
usability for my projects and I copy them from design to design using
copy-paste engineering method. The rest are SMD (the last one I did is
almost 100% SMD :) ) and self-made footprints.
Especially finding out the numeric arguments is funny. Of course the
developers will argue with you that it's actually easy, because they
know the source code by heart ;-)
CL<
>
> Sorry i got to say this i like the look and feel of gEDA but no common
> sense has gone into making these programs work together.
>
> Marc >:o