[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: gEDA vs commercial product
On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:41 +0200, kmk wrote:
> Imagine a copyrighted alphabet ;-)
>
> Bottom line: Non-open standards should be avoided if possible.
Ha...
I was thinking about drawing the parallel between symbols and fonts
which has been made before!
Keeping the parallel, the "Alphabet" is essentially the "symbol list" I
referred to earlier - the part of the "standard" database they don't
want you to copy.
--
Peter Clifton
Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA
Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user