[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: gEDA vs commercial product



On Fri, 2007-03-30 at 19:41 +0200, kmk wrote:

> Imagine a copyrighted alphabet ;-)
> 
> Bottom line: Non-open standards should be avoided if possible.

Ha...

I was thinking about drawing the parallel between symbols and fonts
which has been made before!

Keeping the parallel, the "Alphabet" is essentially the "symbol list" I
referred to earlier - the part of the "standard" database they don't
want you to copy.

-- 
Peter Clifton

Electrical Engineering Division,
Engineering Department,
University of Cambridge,
9, JJ Thomson Avenue,
Cambridge
CB3 0FA

Tel: +44 (0)7729 980173 - (No signal in the lab!)



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user