Re: gEDA-user: DRC question...

[DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>]

> I am not opposed to changing it to only apply the minimum annulus test 
> on holes.  I think the historic reason is pcb used to only have the min 
> width parameter.  But now that we've had the min annulus parameter for a 
> while we should probably flip the switch.  Any objections?

No objections from me.  At some point we should expand the DRC
parameters, too, but I'd rather change to a more flexible file format
first so we don't have to keep adding positional parameters :-P


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user