[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: minipack-result -- gschem

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: minipack-result -- gschem
From: Duncan Drennan <duncan.drennan@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Fri, 13 May 2011 09:29:04 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Fri, 13 May 2011 03:34:27 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=fRDOZ/Mpt83PH278wiV8FLpWb2xnk7FbuoO+OT8vXPA=; b=gxDqT9zyaXKnrVKuU+oiATcoNGuZqT/8SLHRmKlsJl3h6XdxqPiaMUe4FlyVs9DbTj tvP6HWVz2jh6Sll9o31gmgWXqaCMyh72yVXoq25/Z/w8mw6jcVUJ/U03nhECBIxC3uMW CzVLqbczMIMbhbW/USA31q7KmJcQ2EN9kOEXQ=
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=QCWSVsc9WMSeUviCSodRT6Fz06TLplVipoPw2RdyH++aDnvJHU8k0fZr8wugWdFC3G sf67zqLt6Dz6WX2uePkUyDTzluMaajFREMhR/f0js0bruXmEVp8sh68Uj1wHAcGef5Gl qMypNCPlKXX5HKxG716xmayPFfio6ekUep+8o=
In-reply-to: <201105121726.27749.peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <iqcquq$1r9$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <BANLkTinz61rYtQSnED2P2fUTeDmNRMcH_g@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <iqh0l2$o72$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201105121726.27749.peter@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

>> By the way, should the lines of the config files be terminated unix style,
>> or DOS style?
>
> Doesn't make any difference either way.

I did recently pick up a bug with gschem's postscript output and EOL
characters which I must report on launchpad (not related to config
files).

It seems that if there are DOS style newlines in text in the schematic
file, then the postscript output writes a single long line instead of
the multi-line text. If the EOL character is Unix style there are no
problems. gschem handles and displays it correctly, the problem is
only in the postscript output.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

References:
- gEDA-user: crosscompile for windows with minipack
  - From: Kai-Martin Knaak
- Re: gEDA-user: minipack-result -- gschem
  - From: Duncan Drennan
- Re: gEDA-user: minipack-result -- gschem
  - From: Kai-Martin Knaak
- Re: gEDA-user: minipack-result -- gschem
  - From: Peter TB Brett

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: minipack-result -- gschem
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Adding inner polygons to a plane
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: minipack-result -- gschem
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: minipack-result -- gschem
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread