Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

[Russell Shaw <rjshaw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On 18/05/11 00:30, Stefan Salewski wrote:
> On Tue, 2011-05-17 at 23:59 +1000, Russell Shaw wrote:
>
> > Instead of blindly reinventing the wheel, i always look in detail
> > at what currently exists.
>
> Maybe KiCAD is a better starting point for you?
> Written in C++ with wxWidgets, it is available for multiple OS including
> windows. Here in Germany KiCad is more popular than gEDA/PCB, even for
> Linux users. I do not really understand this, I have never find time and
> motivation to really test KiCad myself. While gEDA/PCB has some serious
> users and a large list of projects done with gEDA, KiCAD users seems to
> be more childreen type, making boards with a power LED and a led driver
> chip...
>
> On the KiCAD developer mailing list there is much activity, but there
> are only a few really smart and active developers, so development
> progress is slow. Indeed, nearly all windows KiCAD users seems to be
> only consumers, without any contributions. And there is Fritzing or Qucs
> -- Qucs has schematics and simulation support, but PCB backend is
> missing. Once I had the strange idea to implement a PCB or schematics
> mode for inkscape. Really crazy.

The problem with KiCAD is 1) C++, 2) Qt.

C++ was a *really* bad idea. Qt i don't like because it was fundamentally
architected just for the sake of hiding code from users using the MOC
preprocessor that used to be closed source. Anyway, it's C++ too.

If i got familiar enough with geda, i'd adapt it, but it's a tradeoff
of how much work it would take compared to something new. The biggest
problem is changes without affecting current users. IMO, more progress
would be made by exchanging code between separate projects.


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user