[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
From: John Doty <jpd@xxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 17 May 2011 09:41:45 -0600
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 17 May 2011 11:41:57 -0400
In-reply-to: <4DD28F0C.1020705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <4C86C428.2050101@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201009072324.o87NOcjB032677@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100908000818.GA16118@xxxxxxxxxxx> <i68n7p$sq7$1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20100909004606.GA4326@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1284026077.8108.21.camel@pcjc2lap> <20100909153739.GC4326@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1284051214.13131.19.camel@pcjc2lap> <20100909171713.GF4326@xxxxxxxxxxx> <1284078708.4059.26.camel@pcjc2lap> <20100910180518.GB3717@xxxxxxxxxxx> <9c2ec0e4b50200346c3cb348fa63367e.squirrel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1284155945.3214.13.camel@pcjc2lap> <4DD0BC33.6040604@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1305537986.5930.8.camel@localhost> <4DD10CCC.2020500@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <201105161644.p4GGinek016571@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DD24F94.2070206@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1305635518.2214.19.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DD2799B.7090606@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1305639826.2214.28.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DD27F3C.6000909@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1305642658.2214.48.camel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4DD28F0C.1020705@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On May 17, 2011, at 9:06 AM, Russell Shaw wrote:

> It seems like too much redundancy to have two projects with similar
> uses (which i wouldn't like), and i don't like forking either.

But your vision is an integrated tool, while gEDA is a toolkit.

> 
> I'm still studying geda, but if i did some real work on it, it
> would end up having an extra file format, extra guis, and a closer
> sch/pcb link.

Please, no. These are tools that represent extremely incompatible design philosophies. They work well together only because the interface is clean and simple, and avoids the minefield of integration.

John Doty              Noqsi Aerospace, Ltd.
http://www.noqsi.com/
jpd@xxxxxxxxx

_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: Russell Shaw

References:
- gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation
  - From: Russell Shaw
- Re: gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation
  - From: Peter Clifton
- Re: gEDA-user: pcjc2 tessellation
  - From: Russell Shaw
- gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: Russell Shaw
- Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: Stefan Salewski
- Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: Russell Shaw
- Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: Stefan Salewski
- Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: Russell Shaw
- Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: Stefan Salewski
- Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
  - From: Russell Shaw

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Reinventing the wheel
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread