Re: gEDA-user: EBC vs. 123

[Karel Kulhavy <clock@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

On Wed, Nov 02, 2005 at 01:25:01PM -0500, John Doty wrote:
> Well, it's important that pinseq (1, 2, 3, 4) correspond to (C, B, E, S)
                            ^^^^^^
> for SPICE et al. (substrate optional, of course). Pin numbers should be
      ^^^^^

Ales, could you please put this into the gschem and attribute
documentation in fat golden typeface?

I was wondering about the pinseq during my whole gEDA user career
and only now I understand why it is there!

CL<
> determined by the package (if any). CBE are nice as pinlabels.
> 
> So, for pinseq, it's best to consult the SPICE or SPICE library docs. For
> pin numbers, consult package docs. Labels are arbitrary comments, I
> believe, so whatever you think most informative.
> 
> John Doty "You can't confuse me, that's my job."
> MIT-related mail:  jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx 
> Other mail:  jpd@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
> 
> On Wed, 2 Nov 2005, Karel Kulhavy wrote:
> 
> > Is there any convention how symbols and packages of transistors should
> > be done in gEDA? CBE or 123?
> > 
> > If yes, is it written anywhere?
> > 
> > CL<
> >