[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Pad description obsolete?

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Pad description obsolete?
From: DJ Delorie <dj@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:33:04 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 19 Nov 2005 16:33:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <1132421105.12893.17.camel@localhost.localdomain> (message from Lucas Vogelsang on Sat, 19 Nov 2005 18:25:05 +0100)
References: <20051119130212.439972AA07@earl-grey.cloud9.net> <1132421105.12893.17.camel@localhost.localdomain>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx

>         Pad[-2000 -6500 1500 -6500 6500 3000 9500 "1" "1" "auto,square"]

auto = autorouted (vs manually added) (which is odd for a pad, might mean autoplaced)
square = square pad (vs round pad)

The canonical list of flag names is in src/strflags.c in the
flagbits[] array.  Descriptions of the flags are in src/const.h under
"object flags".

> also the brackets changed.... ( -> [.

This just changes the default units from 1 mil to 0.01 mil.

Follow-Ups:
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Pad description obsolete?
  - From: John Luciani
- Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Pad description obsolete?
  - From: Lucas Vogelsang

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: Old version of geda ?
  - From: Stuart Brorson
- gEDA-user: PCB: Pad description obsolete?
  - From: Lucas Vogelsang

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: OT: Video camera hack
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Pad description obsolete?
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Pad description obsolete?
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: PCB: Pad description obsolete?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread