[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: gEDA-user: Simulation troubles ...
Op maandag 05-11-2007 om 19:48 uur [tijdzone -0500], schreef KURT
PETERS:
> Richard,
> Your problem is a SPICE issue. Simply put, to do a .TF, your source needs
> to be DC.
> So, this should work (I haven't tried it). .TF, .OP, and .DC are all under
> the heading of "type of DC analysis" in my SPICE book.
>
> * gnetlist -g spice-sdb -o test.net test.sch
> .TF V(1) VIN
> .AC DEC 100 10.0 100
> .SAVE V(1)
> .OPT NOPAGE NOMOD
> .WIDTH OUT=133
> *********************************************************
> * Spice file generated by gnetlist *
> * spice-sdb version 2.10.2007 by SDB -- *
> * provides advanced spice netlisting capability. *
> * Documentation at http://www.brorson.com/gEDA/SPICE/ *
> *********************************************************
> *============== Begin SPICE netlist of main design ============
> V1 2 0 sin 0 1 10
> VIN 2 0 DC 0.5V
> R1 2 1 47k
> C2 0 1 100nF
> .end
>
> I hope that helps,
Thank you for your reply, but alas, this didn't work (dozens of error
messages); however, someone else mailed me that I needed to assign both
a DC and an AC value to V1, so that the total simulation list looks like
this:
* gnetlist -g spice-sdb -o test.net test.sch
.TF V(1) V1
.AC DEC 100 10.0 100
.SAVE V(1)
.OPT NOPAGE NOMOD
.WIDTH OUT=133
*********************************************************
* Spice file generated by gnetlist *
* spice-sdb version 2.10.2007 by SDB -- *
* provides advanced spice netlisting capability. *
* Documentation at http://www.brorson.com/gEDA/SPICE/ *
*********************************************************
*============== Begin SPICE netlist of main design ============
V1 2 0 sin 0 1 10 ac 1 dc 1
R1 2 1 47k
C2 0 1 100nF
.end
So at least I have something that works, and that is a great help
already. And as soon as I have a few days to spare, I'll dive into SPICE
more in-depth.
Once again my apologies (to the makers of all this software, and also to
the rest of the group) if my first message sounded "whiny", but I hadn't
expected at all that a GUI simulation tool required a fair amount of
knowledge of the underlying engine, file formats and manual editing.
To me, it's like firing up a word processor and being required to know
about file headers, formatting codes and file storage formats. Then
again, a slightly misaligned paragraph isn't as detrimental to the end
result as a small error in an input or output definition ;-)
And oh, one more (probably stupid) question: does KJWaves offer a Monte
Carlo analysis? Or is this too a matter of learning how to use SPICE?
Anyway, thanks again for your help and patience,
Best regards,
Richard Rasker
_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user