Re: gEDA-user: gEDA/gaf capabilities

[Steve Meier <smeier@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>]

Fair enough.

Steve M.

On Wed, 2007-11-07 at 11:57 -0500, Dan McMahill wrote:
> Steve Meier wrote:
> > This can also be turned around. What are the rquirements that you have
> > for an eda tool set? 
> > 
> > I tend to list the weaknesses of geda/pcb from my perspective.
> > 
> > 1) Lack of support for hierarchical buses.
> > 2) pcb lacks buried, blind and micro vias.
> > 3) no back annotation between pcb and gschem.
> 
> #3 should read "limited back annotation between pcb and gschem".  If you 
>   renumber reference designators in pcb via the Renumber() action, the 
> capability to back annotate that to schematics exists today.  But that 
> is it.  Manual renumbers, new instances, value changes (0.1 uF -> 0.01 
> uF), pin swap, gate swaps, etc are not supported for back annotation.
> 
> -Dan
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> geda-user mailing list
> geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user



_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user