Re: gEDA-user: gerbv-1.0.3 released!

[Stuart Brorson <sdb@xxxxxxxxxx>]

I have no problem with adding a GIT repo for gerbv.  However, there
are only 3 active developers right now, so I am not sure if we need
the power of git as opposed to SF's crusty old CVS system.

You are correct, it makes no sense to make it part of gEDA/gaf.  Gerbv
is a stand-alone project.  OTOH, it does belong in any bundled version
of the gEDA Suite, including my old install CD (if I ever do another
one), the CUED live CD, the Fedora Electronics distro, etc.

If there is a swell of popular demand, then we can communicate
privately about getting a git repo set up.

Cheers,

Stuart


Right

On Wed, 28 Nov 2007, Peter TB Brett wrote:

> On Wednesday 28 November 2007 20:15:12 Peter Clifton wrote:
>
>> Please can we consider moving this to GIT under the umbrella of the
>> gEDA/gaf project (or even a perhaps GIT repo), as this has proven
>> invaluable in many cases with gEDA since (and even before) we switched.
>> I'm biased, as I love GIT - and am starting to feel I know it, but there
>> are simply things you can't do with CVS.
>
> I'd be really happy to see this added as a repo on git.gpleda.org -- but I
> don't think it would make sense for it to be added into the gaf repository.
>
>                          Peter
>
>
> -- 
> Peter Brett
>
> Electronic Systems Engineer
> Integral Informatics Ltd
>


_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user