[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists

To: geda-user@seul.org
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
From: Stephen Meier <smeier@AlchemyResearch.com>
Date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 12:37:07 -0800
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sun, 31 Oct 2004 15:37:37 -0500
In-reply-to: <41854268.1050107@bellsouth.net>
References: <41850A54.2060109@bellsouth.net> <418519E9.5030403@AlchemyResearch.com> <41851CA2.3090306@bellsouth.net> <41853C6D.9030600@AlchemyResearch.com> <41853D44.2040702@AlchemyResearch.com> <41854268.1050107@bellsouth.net>
Reply-to: geda-user@seul.org
Sender: owner-geda-user@seul.org
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.6) Gecko/20040113

If you leave the landpattern for your dummy object and switch the net list to one that doesn't have the dummy object PCB will still run the design rule check routines and not complain about the extra object.

Steve Meier

Bert Douglas wrote:

Stephen Meier wrote:

PCB dosn't seem to care if you have extra landpatterns.


And the significance of this is...?

References:
- gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
  - From: Bert Douglas <bertd@bellsouth.net>
- Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
  - From: Stephen Meier <smeier@AlchemyResearch.com>
- Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
  - From: Bert Douglas <bertd@bellsouth.net>
- Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
  - From: Stephen Meier <smeier@AlchemyResearch.com>
- Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
  - From: Stephen Meier <smeier@AlchemyResearch.com>
- Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
  - From: Bert Douglas <bertd@bellsouth.net>

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: icarus verilog: IVL_LPM_CMP_EQ not supported by thistarget
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: gschem, nets, and netlists
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread