Re: gEDA-user: gEDA DLL hell

To: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: gEDA DLL hell
From: Jakub Piotr CÅapa <jpc@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 13:07:37 +0200
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: geda-user@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 27 Oct 2005 07:07:56 -0400
Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:sender; b=H57pKrd+OE8XDGeigaQGyRpokHcHxAy1df5f0YZDeILgC8v7QCj+fcQhUFNjvCRfAO6ByQuRM642r+Gi7C0/+2xcdUa+3sMjNQEMPu7UeFL7b7WtroIM6LGp8NwZNrnB2In2AaUZEis6FbKVLNm9esbqqx6f0LpUmFDeNtziCYM=
In-reply-to: <20051026140453.GC21330@kestrel>
References: <20051026140453.GC21330@kestrel>
Reply-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-geda-user@xxxxxxxx
User-agent: Thunderbird 1.4.1 (X11/20051006)

Karel Kulhavy wrote:

This is just a practical proof showing that distributions don't
solve the DLL hell (they just move it to the less frequent
applications).


Or just use a real distribution. ;] (gentoo, PLD, Debian)

--
Regards,
Jakub Piotr CÅapa