[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)

To: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Subject: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
From: Dave McGuire <mcguire@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Wed, 1 Oct 2008 01:23:47 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Wed, 01 Oct 2008 01:24:01 -0400
In-reply-to: <200810010517.m915HNB7011622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
List-archive: <http://www.seul.org/pipermail/geda-user>
List-help: <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=help>
List-id: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user.moria.seul.org>
List-post: <mailto:geda-user@moria.seul.org>
List-subscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user>, <mailto:geda-user-request@moria.seul.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <20080928054401.GA31485@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080928134720.3ECDE1428D96@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200809282119.m8SLJ482023711@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080928220946.909FF14216D5@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200809282306.m8SN6tC3026304@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080930025543.210B4140E69A@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200809300331.m8U3VoBb003517@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080930063821.44AB21421BAD@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200809301459.m8UExjUL018979@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20080930153215.B9CEC14247FB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <48E2FC69.5080401@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081001044126.48E8A14260DB@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200810010459.m914x5IV011096@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20081001050507.467EB141BE85@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200810010510.m915AZPQ011441@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <1424514F-A63B-4F09-A8F7-102B42EF5F5A@xxxxxxxxxxxxx> <200810010517.m915HNB7011622@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: gEDA user mailing list <geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Sender: geda-user-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Oct 1, 2008, at 1:17 AM, DJ Delorie wrote:
>>    Not to jump in, but...They're a large vendor whom nobody with a
>> technical clue takes seriously.  I think their "standards" are much
>> more likely to be ignored than most anyone else's.
>
> I think that helps my point.  Talk is cheap, results speak for
> themselves.  Supporting IPC-2581 with PCB won't happen without a
> reason that benefits the one doing the work, and at the moment,
> interoperability with other services is at the top of that list - if
> only there were any to interoperate with.  Writing a spec doesn't make
> you popular.

   Very true.  But if everyone waits for someone to write an  
implementation.. ;)

          -Dave

-- 
Dave McGuire
Port Charlotte, FL




_______________________________________________
geda-user mailing list
geda-user@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://www.seul.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/geda-user

References:
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: John Griessen
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: Rick Collins
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: Rick Collins
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: DJ Delorie
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: Dave McGuire
- Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
  - From: DJ Delorie

Prev by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
Next by Author: Re: gEDA-user: Tips for using gEDA on the MAC
Previous by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
Next by thread: Re: gEDA-user: Driving the netlist from PCB (instead of gschem)
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread