[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: (FWD) Re: Resurrecting Indy - Food for thought

To: independence-l@independence.seul.org
Subject: Re: (FWD) Re: Resurrecting Indy - Food for thought
From: Roger Dingledine <arma@mit.edu>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:58:14 -0400
Delivery-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2001 19:58:20 -0400
In-Reply-To: <3ADE17A8.4D362D85@club-internet.fr>; from jfm2@club-internet.fr on Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:39:36AM +0200
References: <5.1.0.14.2.20010418091731.009f4ec0@pop1.nettaxi.com> <3ADE17A8.4D362D85@club-internet.fr>
Reply-To: independence-l@independence.seul.org
Sender: owner-independence-l@independence.seul.org
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i

On Thu, Apr 19, 2001 at 12:39:36AM +0200, Jean Francois Martinez wrote:
> Indy must be able to work stand alone since it is very difficult to get people
> for
> something who has a too low profile like a set of nehanced packages on an FTP
> site.

Is this true? Specifically, is it true that a set of packages on an ftp
site (including uploading them elsewhere) is necessarily low profile?

--Roger

References:
- Re: (FWD) Re: Resurrecting Indy - Food for thought
  - From: Dinos Kouroushaklis <dinos@bigfoot.com>
- Re: (FWD) Re: Resurrecting Indy - Food for thought
  - From: Jean Francois Martinez <jfm2@club-internet.fr>

Prev by Date: Re: (FWD) Re: Resurrecting Indy - Food for thought
Next by Date: low profile or not?
Prev by thread: Re: (FWD) Re: Resurrecting Indy - Food for thought
Next by thread: Re: (FWD) Re: Resurrecting Indy - Food for thought
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread