[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Logo!
your argument is fine with me.
At 01:49 μμ 15/07/2000 +0200, you wrote:
> > >It ois nice but it tells Indepencence instead of Independence.
>
>Oops! I'll change that off course.
>
>Concerning the penguin stuff: we've already had discussion about how the
>logo *could* be, be it a long time ago. So I am not doing radical new
>things now unless really necessary (e.g. if most people think this logo
>really sucks).
>
>I have been thinking putting a classic Tux on the boy's shirt, but I
>thought that it would be so refreshing to have a logo without it. I have
>been leaning a little bit too much towards the cartoon-style but when I
>noticed that in the result myself, I thought "well, at least it's
>*different*". I think that this being different gives the logo its power
>(it's not special in another way :-). So that's why I didn't put Tuxes
>in it.
>
>Greets,
>
>Stefan
- Follow-Ups:
- remove
- From: "Mike Karmindro" <karmindr@one.net>
- References:
- Logo!
- From: Stefan Rieken <StefanRieken@SoftHome.net>
- Re: Logo!
- Re: Logo!
- From: Stefan Rieken <StefanRieken@SoftHome.net>