RE: Gigabit Bonded Interfaces

[Gerard Paul Java <riker@seul.org>]

Hi,

Yes, quite right.  I don't have the packet format and interface 
information for the bond0 interface although I would gladly include it if 
I could obtain the information.

 On Mon, 3 Mar 2003, Grime, Richard S 
wrote:

> Yep - it's mainly IP traffic on the GB link.  Eth0 reports IP traffic fine,
> but the eth1 & 2 don't report anything, and the bond0 interface doesn't seem
> to be supported directly by IPTRAF.
> 
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Gerard Paul Java [mailto:riker@seul.org] 
> Sent: 03 March 2003 00:55
> To: 'iptraf-users@seul.org'
> Subject: Re: Gigabit Bonded Interfaces
> 
> 
> 
> Hi Richard,
> 
> What kind of traffic do you see?  Is it IP?
> 
> On Wed, 26 Feb 2003, Grime, Richard S wrote:
> 
> > Hi,
> > 
> > Is there an issue running IPTRAF on Slaved interfaces?  No traffic seems
> to
> > be analyzed, although the "Packets Received" count does clock up
> correctly.
> > 
> > Bit of background: the box has three eth interfaces.  Eth0 is the
> management
> > NIC, eth1 & 2 are bonded Gigabit cards - combined average throughput of
> > ~100Mb/s.  It's running Gentoo linux.  I've tried their package &
> compiling
> > the src via ./Setup.
> > 
> > Eth0 reports traffic fine - but this isn't the traffic I'm interested in!
> > 
> > Cheers,
> > 
> > Richard
> > 
>