Yes, I agree. It would be great to merge all patches together.
I could propose my www space to use iptraf. Unfortunatelly I have limited bandwith,
but it should never mind for this temporary period.
Or what about migrating iptref to surceforge?
> since the original iptraf author lost interest - what about moving
> iptraf farther? I.e. "forking" iptraf (basically, taking its latest
> source) and starting a new project, called iptraf-ng?
I did exactly this.
We do not need to append "-ng". I hope that it would be sufficient to rename
major release number.
But there exists centos and redhat related patches that could be also applied.
The last thing would be to add .configure script ability.
regards
Jara
> ----------------------------------------
> > I have published my Atheros related patches of IPTRAF here:
> > http://www.penguin.cz/~fojtik/iptraf/
> >
> > I do not intend to develop IPTRAF, I will only fix compile time
> > problems with newer gcc.
> >
> > It is a big pity, that it is impossible to contact original authors.
> > and to put this release on http://iptraf.seul.org/
>
> Hi,
>
>
> I see distributions already patch iptraf heavily, having at least a
> "point of entry" where all interested parties can exchange patches would
> be great.
>
> --
> Tomasz Chmielewski
Attachment:
WPM$267C.PM$
Description: Mail message body