[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [Libevent-users] Strange timeout scheduling in 1.4

To: libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [Libevent-users] Strange timeout scheduling in 1.4
From: Leonid Evdokimov <leon@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 8 Aug 2011 13:49:19 +0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: libevent-users-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: libevent-users@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Mon, 08 Aug 2011 05:49:26 -0400
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=darkk.net.ru; s=google; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=QLXg/gWdvl9qyWbF9nAc5BJRWFnzu3raAYwvY5QFSe4=; b=FIGQiuooKbWvU9a9UX6LIQ7uDJCbA4RG2wlkZdppK8pLWWPvYmN6xkmitfS7cymfDH mXzVyEb2SmwZ0oUGvw7y5lx8lcsh3pKbZhgAc2sYI02qenfu1Bel5Dc5w6NfnFWnZYP0 nczApmwOQv6tiXSfOGDV25JfCpE0fDkFD7Ozk=
In-reply-to: <CAE8XmWrpZFdoRHLNhU+eG53xZwt+ENz38c2Y-+vcZ4dW4JDZmA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
References: <CAB-U=tCdWZcKKJbDn6c81hwedWV1Nx8E7z=ofYbZDWB0i2DjDQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAKDKvuzfGao8v=dHVa=XcHrZVChtP+5tQJm5aAC0HivEFT3LzA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110727201005.GA17863@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110727211036.GF32592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110728020333.GA7753@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110728023503.GA540@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAKDKvuzqefmycuYxPi3cQPJWwN-4ayrdMHBVQp5tat_TLk5E_w@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110728044908.GA21659@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <20110728073506.GK32592@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAKDKvuwhdB=qtmkLLWd=uS=qwdrarhu6B6kWqxGGNtr7TR4qrw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAB-U=tDQdySnvA1bTr57Yon_yreWTUmf-bosZSTqu-izGin-LQ@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <CAE8XmWrpZFdoRHLNhU+eG53xZwt+ENz38c2Y-+vcZ4dW4JDZmA@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-libevent-users@xxxxxxxxxxxxx

On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 06:12, Dongsheng Song <dongsheng.song@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 8, 2011 at 06:15, Leonid Evdokimov <leon@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
>>
>> 2.6.24 result is really surprising me.
>
> Maybe you forgot the CPU not the same:

That's why I have `memcpy` value - to estimate memory/CPU speed. The
case that surprised me was mono > 10*monoraw. On the other hand that's
openvz host, so it may matter.

--
WBRBW, Leonid Evdokimov
xmpp:leon@xxxxxxxxxxxx && http://darkk.net.ru
tel:+79816800702 && tel:+79050965222
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe libevent-users    in the body.

References:
- Re: [Libevent-users] Strange timeout scheduling in 1.4
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [Libevent-users] Strange timeout scheduling in 1.4
  - From: Leonid Evdokimov
- Re: [Libevent-users] Strange timeout scheduling in 1.4
  - From: Dongsheng Song

Prev by Author: Re: [Libevent-users] Strange timeout scheduling in 1.4
Next by Author: [Libevent-users] [PATCH]: libevent/dns DNS_ERR_NOANSWERS
Previous by thread: Re: [Libevent-users] Strange timeout scheduling in 1.4
Next by thread: Re: [Libevent-users] Strange timeout scheduling in 1.4
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread