[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [Libevent-users] bufferevent with custom IO
On Thu, Sep 6, 2012 at 5:30 PM, Joachim Bauch <jojo@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
> [...]
>> Sounds like a big but fun project. You might want to look at
>> bufferevent_sock.c first; bufferevent_openssl.c has to jump through a
>> lot of annoying hoops because the TLS protocol has a property that
>> doing a read at the TLS abstraction may require a write on the
>> underlying stream, and vice versa. If your protocol doesn't have that
>> feature, you can get much, much simpler than something based on
>> bufferevent_openssl.c.
>
> Thanks for the heads up. The socket-based code surely will be helpful
> when the implementation starts. I wrote an initial draft of how the
> API could look like and put it on github:
> https://github.com/fancycode/Libevent/blob/bufferevent_indirect/include/event2/bufferevent_indirect.h
>
> Any feedback is very welcome!
Having new *connect_hostname commands is making me think that maybe
this should be an abstract method of bufferevent that only some
bufferevent subtypes support.
I'd like a better distinction between functions that should be called
by the implementation, and functions that exist to be called by the
users of this type. Right now I am pretty sure which are which, but
only pretty sure.
It could be cool to have a way to version the API.
I'm also with Mark Ellzey in that I'd like to see a quick example of
how this would get used (that is to say, a little example module).
***********************************************************************
To unsubscribe, send an e-mail to majordomo@xxxxxxxxxxxxx with
unsubscribe libevent-users in the body.