[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

Re: Updates



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----


Re: the dynamic window.

Not sure what I think.  Cool, yes.  Confusing, yes.  Perhaps with better
content inside it won't be so confusing.  Nav window shouldn't have any
search functions otherwise it becomes confusing with the search window.

Honestly though I don't think we *need* it.  If the Search / Nav windows
were one on top of the other I think that would be the most user
intuitive.

One thing you might be surprised about, is that the page is quite useful
under Lynx.

- -- 
Aaron Turner           | Either which way, one half dozen or another. 
aturner@pobox.com      | Check out the Red Hat Linux User's FAQ Online!
www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/
All emails from this account are PGP signed.  Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80  59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8


On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Jason Pincin wrote:

> OK... I know I promised the full page last night.  Didn't make it...
> sorry.  I've been playin around with the navigation stuff and need to
> merge the page content in with the title/headers/navbars, etc.  But I put
> up some of what I've been toying with into CVS... go look at it at:
> 
> http://dev.linuxkb.org/index.html
> 
> Don't be too harsh on criticisms yet :).  Please wait til ya see the fully
> fleshed out page to tell me I suck ;).  Your more than welcome to comment
> on whether you like the dynamic switching between Seach Bar & Navigation
> Bar.  Don't know if I want to stick with it yet or not... it's pretty cool
> in my opinion, and the content within will be modified a little... again,
> this is just the framework with some demo material.  I got some neet
> ideas, and I want to try a few.  Won't take long.
> 
> At any rate... the page is now horribly broken probably in everything
> except Netscape 4.x.  Be patient, I'll fix that.  I develop for the latest
> Netscape, then I make it work elsewhere.  If we stick with the dynamic
> stuff I can make it work across Netscape 4.x & IE 4.x & IE 5 with a small
> browser negotiation routine that I'd run as an SSI.  Very fast.  Slashdot
> uses SSI on there main page... if you don't hit there index.pl custom
> stuff.
> 
> Anyway, just thought I'd start spitting out my thoughts.
> 
> Jason
> 
> 


-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2

iQCVAwUBNvmoBjM3jpXy1kJtAQEmUAQApBBA9pLDhe/PdFrykhhspT1eANU8I3wP
mZrsp22u5KSwiWCx1y99AerQ1x/DZ2dZ60n0cnqJGg/2+ZkIX04zBWiTwj0VvSG4
V/wmEOgIOQ+Rr4g/Yrvt3i7XXDp6Co7OU69yZLZnsQR+VcFLhrVCafej1LVy7+uJ
F1BWnzprPxo=
=RDlh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----