[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Updates
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Re: the dynamic window.
Not sure what I think. Cool, yes. Confusing, yes. Perhaps with better
content inside it won't be so confusing. Nav window shouldn't have any
search functions otherwise it becomes confusing with the search window.
Honestly though I don't think we *need* it. If the Search / Nav windows
were one on top of the other I think that would be the most user
intuitive.
One thing you might be surprised about, is that the page is quite useful
under Lynx.
- --
Aaron Turner | Either which way, one half dozen or another.
aturner@pobox.com | Check out the Red Hat Linux User's FAQ Online!
www.pobox.com/~aturner | http://www.pobox.com/~aturner/RedHat-FAQ/
All emails from this account are PGP signed. Lack of a signature is "bad".
PGP Key fingerprint = FB E1 CE ED 57 E4 AB 80 59 6E 60 BF 45 1B 20 E8
On Wed, 24 Mar 1999, Jason Pincin wrote:
> OK... I know I promised the full page last night. Didn't make it...
> sorry. I've been playin around with the navigation stuff and need to
> merge the page content in with the title/headers/navbars, etc. But I put
> up some of what I've been toying with into CVS... go look at it at:
>
> http://dev.linuxkb.org/index.html
>
> Don't be too harsh on criticisms yet :). Please wait til ya see the fully
> fleshed out page to tell me I suck ;). Your more than welcome to comment
> on whether you like the dynamic switching between Seach Bar & Navigation
> Bar. Don't know if I want to stick with it yet or not... it's pretty cool
> in my opinion, and the content within will be modified a little... again,
> this is just the framework with some demo material. I got some neet
> ideas, and I want to try a few. Won't take long.
>
> At any rate... the page is now horribly broken probably in everything
> except Netscape 4.x. Be patient, I'll fix that. I develop for the latest
> Netscape, then I make it work elsewhere. If we stick with the dynamic
> stuff I can make it work across Netscape 4.x & IE 4.x & IE 5 with a small
> browser negotiation routine that I'd run as an SSI. Very fast. Slashdot
> uses SSI on there main page... if you don't hit there index.pl custom
> stuff.
>
> Anyway, just thought I'd start spitting out my thoughts.
>
> Jason
>
>
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: 2.6.2
iQCVAwUBNvmoBjM3jpXy1kJtAQEmUAQApBBA9pLDhe/PdFrykhhspT1eANU8I3wP
mZrsp22u5KSwiWCx1y99AerQ1x/DZ2dZ60n0cnqJGg/2+ZkIX04zBWiTwj0VvSG4
V/wmEOgIOQ+Rr4g/Yrvt3i7XXDp6Co7OU69yZLZnsQR+VcFLhrVCafej1LVy7+uJ
F1BWnzprPxo=
=RDlh
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
- References:
- Updates
- From: Jason Pincin <jpincin@ashtech.net>