[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: Web Migration FAQ Draft 2.0
I would point them to this MSNBC page which talks about a M$ site being
hacked (which was of course running NT).
Question: If Microsoft can't secure NT, who can?
http://www.msnbc.com/news/327726.asp
On Mon, 8 Nov 1999, Daniel E. Markle wrote:
> On Sat, Nov 06, 1999 at 06:35:58PM -0600, Michael Viron wrote:
> > "Q Why do we have to migrate to a NT server?
> > A Moving the university web pages from a UNIX server to a Windows NT server
> > will provide the university with greater security and stronger integration
> > with the rest of the university systems."
>
> Greater security? What is this guy smoking. I would refer to the many recent
> stories at CNN and other major news outlets of major NT security bugs,
> emphasizing how many of them have not been patched and the lack of such
> security nightmares on Linux.
>
> I would recommend changing your text from configuration issues, which are not
> very compelling, to evidence that they are making a poor, uninformed decision.
> You have to reach higher ups here, and try to stay away from tech talk (like
> SMTP ports). Do you know who is pushing this decision? The techs or the
> PHBs?
>
> Hope this helps.
>
> --
> -------------------
> Daniel E. Markle
> syntax@ashtech.net
> http://www.ashtech.net/syntax
> -------------------
>
--
Aaron Turner, Core Developer http://vodka.linuxkb.org/~aturner/
Linux Knowledge Base Organization http://linuxkb.org/
Because world domination requires quality open documentation.