[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
Re: CVS
Huh? Why does cvs need to be ssh? This is going to be open source
code... why the great security lengths?
I thought one of the main benefits of CVS was the fact that people didn't
need shell access to the box in order to develop???
I don't know about you guys, but what if we go live, and we get flooded
with people willing to contribute, and we take 50 people on as site
hackers... I don't want to hand out 50 shell accounts. Now THAT's
insecure.
Thoughts?
Jason
On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 11:46:54PM -0400, Daniel E. Markle wrote:
> On Fri, Oct 29, 1999 at 11:20:30PM -0400, Jason Pincin wrote:
> > Is this temporary or permanent?
>
> Running the webupdate script is permanent. Unlike the other schemes that have
> been tried it "always" works. It also turns out to be convenient as people
> will need to have a shell open for ssh forwarding of CVS anyway.
>
> --
> -------------------
> Daniel E. Markle
> syntax@ashtech.net
> http://www.ashtech.net/syntax
> -------------------
--
Jason
http://vodka.linuxkb.org/~chardros
- Follow-Ups:
- Re: CVS
- From: Aaron Turner <aturner@linuxkb.org>
- Re: CVS
- From: "Daniel E. Markle" <syntax@ashtech.net>
- References:
- CVS
- From: Micah K Yoder <LYoder@cyberis.net>
- Re: CVS
- From: "Daniel E. Markle" <syntax@ashtech.net>
- Re: CVS
- From: Jason Pincin <chardros@linuxkb.org>
- Re: CVS
- From: "Daniel E. Markle" <syntax@ashtech.net>