[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]
[minion-cvs] saved a couple inches of paper.
Update of /home/minion/cvsroot/doc
In directory moria.seul.org:/home/arma/work/minion/doc
Modified Files:
minion-design.bib minion-design.tex
Log Message:
saved a couple inches of paper.
we're running a bit tight right now.
hopefully it will be better when DH removes his 1.5 pages from
section 3 and replaces them with less in section 7.
David/George: can you do something about the "%" marks in the bibliography?
Index: minion-design.bib
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/minion/cvsroot/doc/minion-design.bib,v
retrieving revision 1.8
retrieving revision 1.9
diff -u -d -r1.8 -r1.9
--- minion-design.bib 7 May 2002 11:45:52 -0000 1.8
+++ minion-design.bib 7 May 2002 12:01:14 -0000 1.9
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
@Misc{batching-taxonomy,
author = {Anonymous},
- title = {On the Cost of Active Attacks Against Various Mixes},
+ title = {From a Trickle to a Flood: Active Attacks on Several Mix Types},
howpublished = {Submitted to Information Hiding Workshop 2002},
}
Index: minion-design.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/minion/cvsroot/doc/minion-design.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.39
retrieving revision 1.40
diff -u -d -r1.39 -r1.40
--- minion-design.tex 7 May 2002 11:45:52 -0000 1.39
+++ minion-design.tex 7 May 2002 12:01:14 -0000 1.40
@@ -43,8 +43,8 @@
% \and
% The Free Haven Project
% \email{\emailaddr{nickm@alum.mit.edu}}}
-\author{Name of Author(s)}
-\institute{Name of Institute(s)}
+\author{Authors Anonymous}
+\institute{}
\maketitle
@@ -90,7 +90,7 @@
and part is due to the complexity of the current infrastructure ---
it is fairly hard to add new experimental features to the current software.
-The Mixminion project aims to deploy a cleaner updated remailer design
+The Mixminion project aims to deploy a cleaner remailer design
in the same spirit as Mixmaster, with the goals of expanding
deployment, documenting our design decisions and how well they stand
up to all known attacks, and providing a research base for
@@ -850,10 +850,9 @@
Actually, Babel is vulnerable to a much more direct timestamp attack:
each layer of the onion is timestamped with ``the number of seconds
elapsed since January 1, 1970 GMT, to the moment of message composition
- by the sender.'' Since the number of people composing a message on
- the same second will likely be small, an adversary owning a MIX at the
- beginning of the path and another at the end could trivially recognize
- a message.
+ by the sender.'' Few people will be composing a message on the same
+ second, so an adversary owning a MIX at the beginning of the path and
+ another at the end could trivially recognize a message.
}) --- to include in each message a timestamp that describes when that message
is valid --- also has problems. Specifically, it introduces a new class
of \emph{partitioning} attacks, where the adversary can distinguish and