[minion-cvs] Add questions/comments to more sections

[nickm@seul.org (Nick Mathewson)]

Update of /home/minion/cvsroot/doc
In directory moria.seul.org:/tmp/cvs-serv23781

Modified Files:
	minion-design.tex 
Log Message:
Add questions/comments to more sections

Index: minion-design.tex
===================================================================
RCS file: /home/minion/cvsroot/doc/minion-design.tex,v
retrieving revision 1.83
retrieving revision 1.84
diff -u -d -r1.83 -r1.84
--- minion-design.tex	6 Nov 2002 03:58:55 -0000	1.83
+++ minion-design.tex	6 Nov 2002 04:10:07 -0000	1.84
@@ -287,6 +287,7 @@
 and other mix features lacking in the Cypherpunk remailers.
 
 \subsection{Known attacks against mix-nets}
+% ???? Move this to the end of section 3?
 
 Attacks against mix-nets aim to reduce the anonymity of users by
 linking anonymous senders with the messages they send, by linking
@@ -476,6 +477,7 @@
 %%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%%
 
 \section{The Mix-net Design}
+% ???? Rename to 'The Mixminion Design'? -NM
 \label{sec:design}
 
 Mixminion uses a free-route mix-net just like \cite{mixmaster-spec}
@@ -615,7 +617,7 @@
 
 \item it should be impossible to recognize the decryption of a modified
       block, without knowledge of the key;
-%what the heck does this mean? i don't know what 'the key' is. this is
+% XXXX what the heck does this mean? i don't know what 'the key' is. this is
 %probably too imprecise for us.
 \item it should be equally secure to use the decryption operation
       for encryption.
@@ -626,6 +628,8 @@
 is, a cipher that acts as a permutation on a block the size of its
 input (a header or the payload).  Possible candidates
 include LIONESS \cite{BEAR-LIONESS} and SPC \cite{SPC}.
+% ???? What can anybody tell me about SPC?  I get no google hits 
+%      except for this paper.-NM  
 The cryptographic property required is that of a super-pseudo-random
 permutation (a.k.a. strong pseudo-random permutation) or SPRP \cite{sprp}.\footnote{
 The weaker PRP property may be sufficient, given that preventing