[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: boilerplate?

To: mixminion-dev@freehaven.net
Subject: Re: boilerplate?
From: "Bryan L. Fordham" <bfordham@socialistsushi.com>
Date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:35:52 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: mixminion-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: mixminion-dev@seul.org
Delivery-date: Tue, 03 Feb 2004 18:37:28 -0500
In-reply-to: <1075774302.4331.6099.camel@liberate.imissjerry.org>
References: <1075774302.4331.6099.camel@liberate.imissjerry.org>
Reply-to: mixminion-dev@freehaven.net
Sender: owner-mixminion-dev@freehaven.net
User-agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.3b) Gecko/20030408 Minotaur/0.1a

Douglas F. Calvert wrote:

From HACKING:

- It would be neat if all the boilerplate that servers spit out were
configurable via some kind of generic boilerplate mechanism, and stored in
separate files. (Difficulty: easy. Invasiveness: slight.)

Can someone elaborate on this one a little bit.

howdy. Are you looking at working on this? I have some time and thought I might, but no reason to if you're already on it 8)

--B

Follow-Ups:
- Re: boilerplate?
  - From: "Bryan L. Fordham" <bfordham@socialistsushi.com>

References:
- boilerplate?
  - From: "Douglas F. Calvert" <dfc@anize.org>

Prev by Author: Re: tracking SURBs (expiration date)
Next by Author: Re: boilerplate?
Previous by thread: Re: boilerplate?
Next by thread: Re: boilerplate?
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread