[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Servers Should Use a Secure Mix Algorithm

To: mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Servers Should Use a Secure Mix Algorithm
From: Colin Tuckley <colin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 11:05:36 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: mixminion-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: mixminion-dev@seul.org
Delivery-date: Thu, 02 Mar 2006 06:05:40 -0500
In-reply-to: <F76F7E156F2C4E03F98A02F1@[192.168.2.22]>
References: <20060227153845.15245.qmail@wiredyne.com> <4406B0D4.6090605@tuckley.org> <F76F7E156F2C4E03F98A02F1@[192.168.2.22]>
Reply-to: mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.7 (X11/20051017)

Thomas Hühn wrote:

> I don't do any testing with sumatra and if someone does testing where the
> algorithm is a real problem, he can simply leave sumatra out.

No, if you are testing the random choice of nodes logic or are using the
server directory to determine node choice then you can't arbitarily leave
any particular node out.

Colin

-- 
Colin Tuckley      |  colin@xxxxxxxxxxx  |  PGP/GnuPG Key Id
+44(0)1903 236872  |  +44(0)7799 143369  |     0x1B3045CE

Why isn't phonetic spelled the way it is pronounced?

References:
- Re: Servers Should Use a Secure Mix Algorithm
  - From: Colin Tuckley
- Re: Servers Should Use a Secure Mix Algorithm
  - From: Thomas Hühn

Prev by Author: Re: Servers Should Use a Secure Mix Algorithm
Next by Author: Re: Servers Should Use a Secure Mix Algorithm
Previous by thread: Re: Servers Should Use a Secure Mix Algorithm
Next by thread: Re: Servers Should Use a Secure Mix Algorithm
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread