[BTW, your original mail got bounced because the address you have subscribed to this list is not the address that sent your mail.] On Sun, Sun, 23 Nov 2003 15:37:27 -0500, "Douglas F. Calvert" <dfc@anize.org> wrote: > Hello, > I recently installed a mixminion server (anize) and it has been added > to the directory. I have a couple of questions. Since mixminion is still > in development are operators encouraged to run the latest release or > should we use the code from CVS? It depends on how much time you want to spend maintaining your server. The stable code tends to be pretty solid, and doesn't need the operator's attention very often after it's started. The CVS code, on the other hand, gets bugs pretty often. Sometimes the server won't start, sometimes messages get lost, and so on. I run the CVS version myself since I want to know about these bugs, but unless you feel like submitting bug reports whenever something weird happens, you might want to stick to 0.0.5.3 until 0.0.6 comes out (really soon now!). > In the README file and the example > config file the directory names change between minion, miniond and > mixminion. Would anyone like me to submit a patch that has a common > directory naming structure for these files? That'd be great. I haven't started revising the README yet for 0.0.6, so any patches would be quite welcome. > I am also interested in finding some of the programs that i have seen > that measure reliability and uptime for servers. I would like to monitor > anize for a little while to make sure everything works okay. What are > people using to generate the statistics seen on the cside and outel > webpages? Is their a need for another public statistics monitoring site? > Thanks a lot...=20 I don't have the source to these programs; you should ask the operators of these sites. (It'd be nice if they'd put their code online, in fact.) -- Nick
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part