[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Directory too optimistic ???

To: mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Directory too optimistic ???
From: Colin Tuckley <colin@xxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 13:11:59 +0000
Delivered-to: archiver@seul.org
Delivered-to: mixminion-dev-outgoing@seul.org
Delivered-to: mixminion-dev@seul.org
Delivery-date: Sat, 05 Nov 2005 08:12:14 -0500
In-reply-to: <1131193902.6455.4.camel@localhost>
References: <1131193902.6455.4.camel@localhost>
Reply-to: mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-mixminion-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Debian Thunderbird 1.0.2 (X11/20050602)

Marco A. Calamari wrote:

> After some test I found that current mixminion directory
>  lists all remailer as OK, including brain dead ones like
>  pbox2 or temporary offline ones as geonosis.
> 
> All remailer in dir are OK; this seems to me impossible.
> 
> I'm wrong ?

The definition of OK as far as the Dir Server is concerned is that they
respond to pings - this doesn't mean that they can actually process
messages. Nick was going to work on it when he got some time.

Colin

-- 
Colin Tuckley      |  colin@xxxxxxxxxxx  |  PGP/GnuPG Key Id
+44(0)1903 236872  |  +44(0)7799 143369  |     0x1B3045CE

Experience is the hardest kind of teacher. It gives you the test first, and
the lesson afterward. - Anonymous

Follow-Ups:
- Re: Directory too optimistic ???
  - From: Marco A. Calamari

References:
- Directory too optimistic ???
  - From: Marco A. Calamari

Prev by Author: Where to move the binaries
Next by Author: Re: Please try a mixminion alpha before I release it.
Previous by thread: Directory too optimistic ???
Next by thread: Re: Directory too optimistic ???
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread