[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #25886 [Core Tor/Tor]: Have frac_nodes_with_descriptors() take and use for_direct_connect
#25886: Have frac_nodes_with_descriptors() take and use for_direct_connect
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner: neel
Type: defect | Status:
| needs_revision
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.3.5.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-bridge-client, tor-guard, | Actual Points:
bootstrap |
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: dgoulet | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by neel):
Thank you for your response.
I don't fully know what a "full descriptor" is. Does this mean that for
bridges:
* We have `node->ri` only? (based on `node_has_preferred_descriptor()`)
* We have `node->ri`, `node->rs`, and `node->md`? (I am guessing this
one)
Also, I did not see any function in `bridges.h` which directly checks for
full descriptors (or didn't see them if they were unobvious).
The closest thing I saw were functions which get a list of bridges
(`bridge_list_get()`) so then I get a `SMARTLIST`, and in each iteration
get a `node_t` from the `bridge_info_t` and check for a full descriptor.
Should I do this? If not, which function should I use?
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25886#comment:13>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs