[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-bugs] #25886 [Core Tor/Tor]: Have frac_nodes_with_descriptors() take and use for_direct_connect
#25886: Have frac_nodes_with_descriptors() take and use for_direct_connect
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Reporter: nickm | Owner: neel
Type: defect | Status:
| needs_revision
Priority: Medium | Milestone: Tor:
| 0.3.5.x-final
Component: Core Tor/Tor | Version:
Severity: Normal | Resolution:
Keywords: tor-bridge-client, tor-guard, | Actual Points:
bootstrap |
Parent ID: | Points:
Reviewer: dgoulet | Sponsor:
-------------------------------------------------+-------------------------
Comment (by teor):
Replying to [comment:13 neel]:
> Thank you for your response.
>
> I don't fully know what a "full descriptor" is.
A router descriptor, rather than a microdescriptor:
https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/dir-spec.txt#n151
> Does this mean that for bridges:
> * We have `node->ri` only? (based on `node_has_preferred_descriptor()`)
ri (router info) is used to store router descriptors.
> * We have `node->ri`, `node->rs`, and `node->md`? (I am guessing this
one)
Bridges don't have rs (router status) or md (microdescriptor), because
bridges are not in the consensus.
> Also, I did not see any function in `bridges.h` which directly checks
for full descriptors (or didn't see them if they were unobvious).
>
> The closest thing I saw were functions which get a list of bridges
(`bridge_list_get()`) so then I get a `SMARTLIST`, and in each iteration
get a `node_t` from the `bridge_info_t` and check for a full descriptor.
Should I do this? If not, which function should I use?
`num_bridges_usable(0) > 0`, which is actually in entrynodes.h :
https://github.com/torproject/tor/blob/5edc72a45b7479f5fe791054aa19f6b3b478c725/src/or/entrynodes.c#L3149
--
Ticket URL: <https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/ticket/25886#comment:14>
Tor Bug Tracker & Wiki <https://trac.torproject.org/>
The Tor Project: anonymity online
_______________________________________________
tor-bugs mailing list
tor-bugs@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-bugs