[or-cvs] [tor/master 2/3] Try to untangle the logic in server_port_flush

[nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Author: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Mon, 25 Jan 2010 14:09:58 -0500
Subject: Try to untangle the logic in server_port_flush
Commit: 2590d733f4f3c6968bcdcb9880875ea90295ea80

It's a bit confusing to have a loop where another function,
confusingly named "*_free", is responsible for advancing the loop
variable (or rather, for altering a structure so that the next time
the loop variable's initializer is evaluated it evaluates to something
different.)

Not only has this confused people: it's also confused coverity scan.
Let's fix that.
---
 src/or/eventdns.c |    7 +++++--
 1 files changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/src/or/eventdns.c b/src/or/eventdns.c
index a504224..06add11 100644
--- a/src/or/eventdns.c
+++ b/src/or/eventdns.c
@@ -1293,8 +1293,8 @@ server_port_read(struct evdns_server_port *s) {
 static void
 server_port_flush(struct evdns_server_port *port)
 {
-	while (port->pending_replies) {
-		struct server_request *req = port->pending_replies;
+	struct server_request *req = port->pending_replies;
+	while (req) {
 		ssize_t r = sendto(port->socket, req->response, req->response_len, 0,
                        (struct sockaddr*) &req->addr, (socklen_t)req->addrlen);
 		if (r < 0) {
@@ -1306,6 +1306,9 @@ server_port_flush(struct evdns_server_port *port)
 		if (server_request_free(req)) {
 			/* we released the last reference to req->port. */
 			return;
+		} else {
+			assert(port->pending_replies != req);
+			req = port->pending_replies;
 		}
 	}
 
-- 
1.6.5