On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 03:18:21PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote: > On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 02:51:40PM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote: > > Looks plausible. Anything else we'll have to learn through trying to > > build it rather than through thinking hard. > > I take it back. Here's another underspecified part: > > In section 3, it says "authorities receiving an extra-info > document should verify..." > > What does it do if one of these properties is false? In particular, > I am thinking about if the first or third property is false. > > Is the answer just "dump it" because we require the server to publish > the descriptor right before publishing the extra_info? I'm going with "dump it" If the server publishes wrong, that's the server's problem. The way I'm coding this up, we retain an extra-info document for as long as we retain the corresponding router-info. > Do we care if > the two posts are in the same directory connection or different ones? No. Assuming that this looks plausible to you, I'll make the right changes to 104. -- Nick Mathewson
Attachment:
pgpLcPXJFgxGE.pgp
Description: PGP signature