Re: Plan for proposal 104 (was: New system for modifying Tor protocol)

[Roger Dingledine <arma@xxxxxxx>]

On Mon, Apr 16, 2007 at 05:22:43PM -0400, Nick Mathewson wrote:
> > Is the answer just "dump it" because we require the server to publish
> > the descriptor right before publishing the extra_info?
> 
> I'm going with "dump it" If the server publishes wrong, that's the
> server's problem.  The way I'm coding this up, we retain an extra-info
> document for as long as we retain the corresponding router-info.
> 
> Assuming that this looks plausible to you, I'll make the right changes
> to 104.

Sounds great. Thanks.
--Roger