[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [or-cvs] r17790: {tor} Refactor tor_addr_t manipulation functions so that as few as (tor/trunk/src/common)

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [or-cvs] r17790: {tor} Refactor tor_addr_t manipulation functions so that as few as (tor/trunk/src/common)
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:47:19 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:47:22 -0500
In-reply-to: <4ef5fec60812270119s4a38e851m2cfc461afc6ec2c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20081226212605.EBC6F140AC21@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60812262109i598704f3l455d5afea7f8f8ae@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> <4ef5fec60812270119s4a38e851m2cfc461afc6ec2c1@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.5.13 (2006-08-11)

On Sat, Dec 27, 2008 at 01:19:10AM -0800, coderman wrote:
> 2008/12/26 coderman <coderman@xxxxxxxxx>:
> > ...
> 
> next up is:
> connection.c: In function `retry_listeners':
> connection.c:1423: error: invalid application of `sizeof' to
> incomplete type `sockaddr_un'
> 
> not sure if this should be wrapped if a #ifndef MS_WINDOWS or other.
> AF_UNIX appears to be defined, just no sockaddr_un...

Thanks; these should both be fixed now.

References:
- Re: [or-cvs] r17790: {tor} Refactor tor_addr_t manipulation functions so that as few as (tor/trunk/src/common)
  - From: coderman
- Re: [or-cvs] r17790: {tor} Refactor tor_addr_t manipulation functions so that as few as (tor/trunk/src/common)
  - From: coderman

Prev by Author: Re: bug in address family checking?
Next by Author: Re: Proposal: Avoiding infinite length circuits
Previous by thread: Re: [or-cvs] r17790: {tor} Refactor tor_addr_t manipulation functions so that as few as (tor/trunk/src/common)
Next by thread: Tor 'dissector' for Wireshark
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread