[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents

To: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:11:39 -0500
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Tue, 28 Feb 2017 12:11:57 -0500
Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id :subject:to; bh=myOC4+UNCMq6EwnpJuqTs4ZsVTxlIN+I2InvMGdlwv4=; b=Unh3AWApebhX7Sq/DBAY8DBoSkmiyzH9OuaHJpfsdP5xTtk2romsZE6mFplOSLoonW O7TR0iytN6RSgQVv1C1AwN+dCK0iwddwPK/vLK/fRvaIOCZl8w3sqWznCAfetXz6SLeI QOyKchVZhtsG+2CkGAQMsS7Vg6HBn01+L1oMy6c2ZHovwchsFNk0tpPuUcca87s6JPmi Y+6WTd6/x7B81TO5vD2/S8BJC1kEuC7iPCcCcKka3VNTOA2abyzoPnZ6v7Lmed9mCrcm yHOkqoXcs+5GLTx2FdnVYIxFcKfr+8V3cdFdqf+GsjKxcqyQfPyIDyKUqqvhlK0wgRdQ fQrw==
In-reply-to: <87D741B5-3899-4979-8C91-C12EAA100C78@gmail.com>
List-archive: <http://lists.torproject.org/pipermail/tor-dev/>
List-help: <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=help>
List-id: discussion regarding Tor development <tor-dev.lists.torproject.org>
List-post: <mailto:tor-dev@lists.torproject.org>
List-subscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=subscribe>
List-unsubscribe: <https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/options/tor-dev>, <mailto:tor-dev-request@lists.torproject.org?subject=unsubscribe>
References: <CAKDKvuzHY-Hzykf1FJS1n8ZFDD-=dOY1=eL2i=MSE=-wPSccLA@mail.gmail.com> <90E95F9F-A91C-426C-A342-FE5F7DA5CDB7@gmail.com> <CAKDKvuyVL_49YxseCeb6VuJ5EAbJ59nvcuNxZ0jym9R0KvJrNw@mail.gmail.com> <87D741B5-3899-4979-8C91-C12EAA100C78@gmail.com>
Reply-to: tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: "tor-dev" <tor-dev-bounces@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>

On Tue, Feb 28, 2017 at 6:42 AM, teor <teor2345@xxxxxxxxx> wrote:

Hi, Tim!

This looks pretty plausible to me. Do you have time to write up a
quick&dirty python function that actually performs the smoothing?  If
so, I can test it out on the January consensuses and measure the
impact on compressed diff sizes.
_______________________________________________
tor-dev mailing list
tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
  - From: teor

References:
- [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
  - From: teor
- Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
  - From: Nick Mathewson
- Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
  - From: teor

Prev by Author: [tor-dev] Proposal 277: Detect multiple relay instances running with same ID
Next by Author: Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
Previous by thread: Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
Next by thread: Re: [tor-dev] Proposal 276: Report bandwidth with lower granularity in consensus documents
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread