On Wed, 11 Jan 2017 19:57:07 +0100 bancfc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > Its my guess that that timer values added in ISNs should now be > indistinguishable from the rest of the hashed secret outlined in > RFC-6528.[1] Can anyone knowledgeable in reading kernel code [2] > please confirm that this kills clock skew extraction [3] and > fingerprinting [4] described in Steven Murdoch's papers? The issue isn't the choice of the hash algorithm, and the patch doesn't change net/core/secure_seq.c:seq_scale() at all, nor how/when it's called. So no, it doesn't fix the issue. Regards, -- Yawning Angel
Attachment:
pgpdyCsuH5WBG.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev