On Tue, 17 May 2016 17:49:46 +0000 (UTC) lukep <lukep@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > [snip] > > > In other words, I'd expect our future trust in Ring-LWE and SIDH > > > to evolve in different ways. And counting papers will not be > > > informative. > > > > Yeah probably. I can envision having no choice but to use SIDH > > sometime in the future (or vice versa). It's an evolving field, > > and my current mindset is "pick one or two that probably won't kill > > the network (CPU/network/whatever)", integrate it in a way that is > > easy to switch at a later point, and deploy it. > > The important thing now is surely to get the protocol right so that > we can slot algorithms in or out (then pick one or two that we > actually want to integrate) The relevant proposals here would be: https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/proposals/264-subprotocol-versions.txt https://gitweb.torproject.org/torspec.git/tree/proposals/249-large-create-cells.txt With emphasis on the 264, since that's probably how link handshake crypto support will be signified. Regards, -- Yawning Angel
Attachment:
pgpDWANNf6eON.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev