> and about windows, > it is a requirement for my situation , but i just saw some build scripts > regarding windows in the tbb repo you mentioned; i would be happy to > hear from you about tips and tricks regarding windows! So tor-browser-build lets us make all our build targets (windows, mac, android, etc) on a Linux host (I'm 99% sure those of us using it are all using Debian or Debian derivatives). If you are stuck using windows for whatever reason there may be a few options (though none of them are particularly good): It *may* be possible to get tor-browser-build working in the new Windows Subsystem for Linux in Windows 10, but to my knowledge no has tried it. Maybe you can just clone the repo, apt-get the dependencies and go. Another option for you would be running a Debian VM in HyperV/VirtualBox/etc and running tor-browser-build there, but that first build will definitely take awhile. Yet another option would be to acquire the tor-browser-build build artifacts necessary to build Windows firefox, and setup a Debian build environment (via your preferred virtualization method) and replicate the firefox project's build process. > 1) padding is the time period which i send random packets to random > destinations for generating fake browsing pattern. I'm not sure what this is supposed to accomplish, and my first instinct is that this is a very bad idea. See https://2019.www.torproject.org/projects/torbrowser/design/#idm660 for discussion around why we don't use randomization as a strategy to avoid fingerprinting. I highly doubt we would want anything like this in Tor Browser > 2) rotation is a fancy name for MaxCircuitDirtiness I feel like this is a sort of knob that only 'advanced' users should/would use, an as such keeping it in the torrc and not exposing it in the user-facing preferences page is probably best. We generally want to avoid leaving foot-guns laying around. > 3) idle timeout is a custom clock which will close the tbb automatically > in case of no interaction from the user Could be a neat off-by-default option to have in the 'Privacy & Security' page (as it is not tor-specific). I'm not sure if we'd accept this feature but I think a case could be made. > 4) use proxy & use bridge is already available inside tbb Indeed > 5) entry, middle and exit countries will fill the torrc with user > selected options This one actually intrigues me a little bit. There are certainly situations where on a per-site basis controlling which country your exit is can be useful (for avoiding IP-based censorship, 'this video not available in your country' nonsense). As it is the current 'hit new circuit until it works' workflow is not the best. I don't see any particular benefit exposing this level of control over guard and middle relays, nor do I think the exits should be a global setting. The level of control exposed as you have in these screenshots seems like another foot-gun. best, -Richard On 11/14/19 1:55 AM, sarpedon montecarlo wrote: > Hi Richard, this is great! > I appreciate all the insights you gave me. > about the build setup i would definitely go with your suggestion. maybe > it would be possible to also use these build scripts inside a docker > composer for a reload on demand during development. and about windows, > it is a requirement for my situation , but i just saw some build scripts > regarding windows in the tbb repo you mentioned; i would be happy to > hear from you about tips and tricks regarding windows! > > basically what i am about to implement are as below: > > image.png > > image.png > > image.png > > above screen shots are from the browser extension that i have already > implemented and want to integrate with the tbb. > > 1) padding is the time period which i send random packets to random > destinations for generating fake browsing pattern. > > 2) rotation is a fancy name for MaxCircuitDirtiness > > 3) idle timeout is a custom clock which will close the tbb automatically > in case of no interaction from the user > > 4) use proxy & use bridge is already available inside tbb > > 5) entry, middle and exit countries will fill the torrc with user > selected options > > based on the commit you mentioned for "about:preferences#tor pane", i > believe that commit is the right place i should start coding. > > Best Regards, > Sarpedon > > On Wed, Nov 13, 2019 at 9:33 PM Richard Pospesel <richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > <mailto:richard@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>> wrote: > > Hey Sarpedon, > > The tor-browser-build project ( > https://gitweb.torproject.org/builders/tor-browser-build.git/ ) can be > used to build tor-browser for all the various environments, and you can > updated the /projects/firefox/config file to point to your own git repo > and commit for development. Unfortunately this is not particularly fast, > but it's really the only way to go if you need builds for platforms > other than Linux. > > Alternatively, you can just build tor-browser ( > https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor-browser.git/ ), and copy the relevant > bits over an existing tor-browser install. This is the workflow I use > during development on Linux and is generally pretty straight forward to > use once you have scripts setup to do the deploying. > > It's theoretically possible to get this sort of incremental build setup > working for other platforms (ie building windows bins in a linux dev > environment), but it's a pain and would require delving into the > tor-browser-build firefox build and config scripts. I've done it before > for our older windows build target (before we switched to clang and > friends) and can give you some tips on how to do that if necessary. > > The Tor Browser Hacking Guide should be a good resource as well, though > it is a living document so might be out of date: > > https://trac.torproject.org/projects/tor/wiki/doc/TorBrowser/Hacking > > If you're interested in updating/improving/adding to the > about:preferences#tor pane, than you can start by looking at this commit > which added the page: > > https://gitweb.torproject.org/tor-browser.git/commit/?h=tor-browser-68.2.0esr-9.5-1&id=bea7e61c120f207e7e1a65041b44dc1998e3656a > > In general, the relevant things there are in: > > /browser/components/torpreferences/* > /browser/modules/TorProtocolService.jsm > /browser/modules/TorStrings.jsm > > What sort of improvements are you looking to add? If you're interested > in submitting a patch, you should open a ticket that tracks whatever > feature you're looking to add. There we can give you early code and > design/UX feedback to improve the odds of us accepting your patch :) > > best, > -Richard > > > On 11/9/19 4:04 PM, sarpedon montecarlo wrote: > > Hello to the community! > > my first question is that is there a solution for rapid development of > > tbb? i was wondering that each time a contributor wants to change > > something in the tbb or add extra functionality, they have to go > through > > the build process which i just guess would be very time consuming. > i was > > wondering that is there any containerized environment for this? any > > docker ecosystem available or other solutions that might help? > > my second question is about the changes that i want to implement. i am > > interested into the graphical settings page about bridges and tor > > process that currently tbb is exposing to the end users. if we want to > > add more functionality into this settings page, where should we > start to > > change? and is there any possibility that we may have some control > over > > the underlying tor process as well, for instance controlling it's > > launching or it's torrc configuration; because as i see, there > must be a > > link between the graphical interface of tbb and the underlying tor > > process so that is the way we can control bridges for instance. > similar > > to this i was planning to add more graphical options to the interface > > for controlling other configuration aspects of the tor process through > > it's torrc or other workarounds. > > in the past i have achieved this by writing a browser extension that > > benefits from native messaging for communication to the tor > process; but > > this is not really performance friendly and an intuitive > experience for > > the end users.i am not satisfied with the result. so i was > interested on > > mirroring these functionalities inside tbb. > > i really appreciate your insights and thoughts on the matter, > > have a great day, > > Sarpedon. > > > > _______________________________________________ > > tor-dev mailing list > > tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev > > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx <mailto:tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev > > > _______________________________________________ > tor-dev mailing list > tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx > https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev >
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
_______________________________________________ tor-dev mailing list tor-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-dev