[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

Re: Proposal: Network status entries need a new Unnamed flag

To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Proposal: Network status entries need a new Unnamed flag
From: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 4 Oct 2007 12:36:04 -0400
Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
Delivery-date: Thu, 04 Oct 2007 12:36:13 -0400
In-reply-to: <20071004150912.GN20802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Mail-followup-to: Nick Mathewson <nickm@xxxxxxxxxxxxx>, or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
References: <20071004150912.GN20802@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
User-agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i

On Thu, Oct 04, 2007 at 11:09:13AM -0400, Roger Dingledine wrote:
> Filename: xxx-unnamed-flag.txt
> Title: Network status entries need a new Unnamed flag

Added as proposal 122.

-- 
Nick Mathewson

Attachment: pgp8tRiOMciPL.pgp
Description: PGP signature

References:
- Proposal: Network status entries need a new Unnamed flag
  - From: Roger Dingledine

Prev by Author: Re: Turning off a server
Next by Author: Re: Proposal: Network status entries need a new Unnamed flag
Previous by thread: Proposal: Network status entries need a new Unnamed flag
Next by thread: Re: Proposal: Network status entries need a new Unnamed flag
Index(es):
- Author
- Thread