[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Exit guards?
- To: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: Exit guards?
- From: "Michael_google gmail_Gersten" <keybounce@xxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2007 22:12:45 -0700
- Delivered-to: archiver@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev-outgoing@xxxxxxxx
- Delivered-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxx
- Delivery-date: Wed, 19 Sep 2007 01:12:54 -0400
- Dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; bh=nTGirrHvAi8Wl9Q8plwVZuuXe0iFAsC9fkWFqefaAnA=; b=ZYoeXKKyIxe4QtpkoZV7qh/OHWD8aT0TKFUCeAAx0ov5kWOkSEGSDl89Xh2HUxno1P2xnMo1kFptZKiSbw93DpbkjHlU4VFaDGicUZ3zUHw1C3GAayNNcxFWKAQUjXvrCRpDlTiu2VRnaIc6YCA4uAO858EC14aFtNkS+/gtBao=
- Domainkey-signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition; b=QQEoPFEXM41QxjH5ScBYX7FnEpQrJxnI1xw92nj/Y8q7zHjvDOO7A3KCvLVT0r3wZrNTvoOkcnnwSuA8+Xf1hLxqRv0FloFMSEgpjVxvDcW+5J6vj32JAhxdkKgoUmDrHvpRM75BEmI6nPd+ze+HfPw3lVtig33rVL5VDqFNxAQ=
- Reply-to: or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Sender: owner-or-dev@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
Thinking about the "evil exit node" issue, I'm wondering: Do we need
exit guards?
Entry guards aren't magical. Without entry guards, you will eventually
hit a path with both the entry and exit node under control of the
attacker, and your anonymity is lost.
Same idea for exit guards. Not magical. But now you have a chance that
your information won't be lost to a bad node, while without them you
will eventually hit a bad exit node.