[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
Re: [tor-project] Use of "tor" as part of the name for sbws Debian package
On 2018-07-24 18:22, Matthew Finkel wrote:
> It seems this is coming, at least in part, from this comment:
>
> > Well, tor-* was a proposal to disambiguate a short name. I don't
> > particularly care what the prefix would be.
>
> https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=903977#32
>
> So, no, not all packages need the tor- prefix, but because "sbws" is a
> simple, short name they're future-proofing against a collision.
It looks like the "tor-" convention already exists in Debian, so I'd be
in favor of following it.
For instance, these came up from `apt list` in Debian stretch:
tor
tor-arm
tor-dbg
tor-dbgsym
tor-geoipdb
torchat
torsocks
Dave
_______________________________________________
tor-project mailing list
tor-project@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
https://lists.torproject.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/tor-project