[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]
[tor-relays] Re: Relay forest18 is still not on the consensus
- To: tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
- Subject: [tor-relays] Re: Relay forest18 is still not on the consensus
- From: forest-relay-contact--- via tor-relays <tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
- Date: Mon, 05 Jan 2026 00:31:14 -0000
- In-reply-to: <176699860702.3409409.10569849596883191963@lists-01.torproject.org>
- List-id: "support and questions about running Tor relays (exit, non-exit, bridge)" <tor-relays.lists.torproject.org>
- References: <176699860702.3409409.10569849596883191963@lists-01.torproject.org>
- Reply-to: forest-relay-contact@xxxxxxxxxxxxx
- User-agent: HyperKitty on https://lists.torproject.org/
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512
Hello.
Regarding the very poor performance of forest18 (and a few others), is
there anything that can be done to boost their weights? I have no idea
why the bandwidth authorities are reporting such low performance, since
I get decent throughput to servers in their locations.
Will the consensus weights slowly increase, or will it be indefinitely
capped? Or should I just spin up 16 relays on each IP?
It's very discouraging to spend more than $1000 per year on dozens of
diverse VPSes and achieve about the same throughput in total that I get
from a single $9.99/year Black Friday promo VPS in the Netherlands. I
get that the diversity is still useful, but still...
Regards,
forest
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
iHUEARYKAB0WIQQtr8ZXhq/o01Qf/pow+TRLM+X4xgUCaVsGmAAKCRAw+TRLM+X4
xhvvAQCbWV6iFMIod2QVzh43+SwBgX9Fmk8THvGpoXMFMgQxoAEAlOrJ7U1cIUYB
roTy3/SjBY/uEgJsUnVIi47THSRgJgk=
=xZwf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list -- tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to tor-relays-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx