[Author Prev][Author Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Author Index][Thread Index]

[tor-relays] Re: Netscan Hetzner



No, do not expect a persistent routing issues to the 4 listed /24s.

Two temporary provider caused outages, specifically, emergency maintenance before Christmas, and an outage before New Year’s; root cause is still under investigation, with only a physical link loss on provider equipment confirmed so far.



On Monday, December 29th, 2025 at 3:17 AM, Marco Moock via tor-relays <tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:

> 

> 

> On 29.12.2025 03:24 Tobias Sachs via tor-relays wrote:
> 

> > I just blocked the ranges to prevent the relay from being shut down.
> > 

> > ufw deny out to 64.65.0.0/22
> > ufw deny out to 64.65.62.0/23
> > ufw deny out to 96.9.98.0/24
> > ufw deny out to 216.181.20.0/24
> 

> 

> I can ping 64.65.0.0 via the publicly available RIPE/GLOBALPLING probes.
> 

> Are you sure this is a persistent routing issue?
> _______________________________________________
> tor-relays mailing list -- tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> To unsubscribe send an email to tor-relays-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx

Attachment: publickey - tor@1aeo.com - 0x9288289B.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
tor-relays mailing list -- tor-relays@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to tor-relays-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx